4 ms·
This seems to me like someone realizing they've been using JS in really terrible ways and trying to stop that by just forcing themselves to not use JS at all. I
by ebbv 11y ago
This seems to me like someone realizing they've been using JS in really terrible ways and trying to stop that by just forcing themselves to not use JS at all. It's not JS's fault that people use it in terrible ways.
One page web apps aren't inherently bad, and neither are sites that don't use JS. It depends on what you're trying to accomplish. You can write a bad site with JS you can write a bad site with no JS.
I think the problem that this developer's "No JS" approach is forcing her to solve is the problem of not thinking through your architecture enough. By saying "I will not use JS", she is forcing herself to put more thought into how things are implemented and that's always going to result in something better than if you just slap something together.
But I think it's a mistake to think that JS is the problem.
- Roboprog 11y agoIf you, or more likely, your organization, does NOT want to learn / use Javascript, then this probably IS the way to go. Not my cup of tea, but for many real world organizations, they have to restrict the scope of what the group will do to avoid chaos. Yes, this makes me sad, but it is what it is.