4 ms·
Problem is, we still have jpgs. As long as we have raster images (instead of vector images), we'll be laying some things out based on pixels. And as long as we
by ktRolster 11y ago
Problem is, we still have jpgs. As long as we have raster images (instead of vector images), we'll be laying some things out based on pixels.
And as long as we have photographs, we're going to have raster images, for the foreseeable future.
- adrianN 11y agoRasterizing vector images to different sizes without getting blurry results is not trivial.
- iso-8859-1 11y agoIf all targets have a relatively high DPI, does that still hold? Wouldn't it be more correct to say "it isn't trivial to rasterize vector images for low-DPI displays?"
- oneeyedpigeon 11y agoWhy not have the interface scale the image to the required size, as HTML/CSS can do?