5 ms·
Couple things: 1. At any scale pretty much AWS / GCE are less expensive than Heroku. They also come at an non-zero operational cost. Say, switching to Google A
by sargun 11y ago
Couple things:
1. At any scale pretty much AWS / GCE are less expensive than Heroku. They also come at an non-zero operational cost. Say, switching to Google App Engine (the cheapest from my understanding) -- would save them 75% of their bill (just back of the napkining). -- That's not much, compared to the cost of having someone migrate the platform over (multiple work-weeks)
2. S3 != Imgix. Imgix is a CDN + Image resizing service. At a couple employers ago we tried to run our own image resizing service in house, and it was a royal pain in the ass. I can go into this if you're interested.
The other thing is S3. My current employer uses S3 pretty heavily, and S3 is really not meant for end-user data access it seems. It suffers from lots of latency spikes, and a non-zero error rate. Slow, and unreliable sites make your users go away.
- burtmacklin 11y agoI wouldn't mind hearing about the pain points you encountered when hosting your own images...
- callmeed 11y ago> S3 != Imgix Ok, well, S3 + CloudFront just about is. Yes, I understand Imgix has other features like on-demand resizing. But it looks like Unsplash is a rails app–in which case a library like Refile [0] can handle that. [0] https://github.com/refile/refile https://github.com/refile/refile
- joshmn 11y agoImgix isn't just Imagemagick. Good read here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9963680 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9963680