5 ms·

Draft: The Salmon Protocol

• brown9-2 17y ago
  I was struck by the reference to RFC 2119 The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119 I guess there really does need to be a standards specification for everything
  • nfnaaron 17y ago
    Of course. Standards, of all things, should be written in a standard way. And the standard way in which they're written should also be expressed in a standard way.
• donaq 17y ago
  Ah, I thought it was like the Pigeon Protocol, or IPoAC.
• Semiapies 17y ago
  A way to get conversations out of service "silos". Excellent. Cue 50 comments on how this is an evil attempt by Google to make money and monopolize everything.