4 ms·
Not the gov but you. The paragraph you quoted says "harassment doesn't have to be of sexual nature" and you are using it to support the claim that "sexual hara
by qb45 11y ago
Not the gov but you.
The paragraph you quoted says "harassment doesn't have to be of sexual nature" and you are using it to support the claim that "sexual harassment doesn't have to be of sexual nature".
- scott_s 11y agoAnd that paragraph is under the title "Sexual Harassment". It is clear to me that when they say "harassment", they mean "sexual harassment". Otherwise, the sentence would not be under that title. You're free to disagree, but your disagreement has no bearing on the laws we operate under. (Assuming you are in the US.)
- qb45 11y agoThe exact paragraph you quoted from section on "sexual harassment" is copy-pasted from section on "sex-based discrimination". And it's not law, but some guidance/advice/faq/whatever. You are overinterpreting this thing.
- scott_s 11y agoI think I am interpreting this thing in a straight-forward manner. This is the part of the government responsible for ensuring equal employment opportunities telling the public that it does not limit "sexual harassment" to harassment of a sexual nature.