> That crook literally killed a strategically viable public transport network just so he could line his own pockets. I'm always somewhat sceptical when I hear

> That crook literally killed a strategically viable public transport network just so he could line his own pockets. I'm always somewhat sceptical when I hear criticism of this form. I know nothing about the case of Dr Beeching in particular, but isn't it plausible that someone supports commercial development of the road network whilst at the same time acting against the rail system simply because he believes that road is a better direction for the country to go in?