4 ms·
> Those all seem to be sponsored. Even if that is true I would rather see public money sponsoring real open access journals than spend paying author fees and s
by p4bl0 11y ago
> Those all seem to be sponsored.
Even if that is true I would rather see public money sponsoring real open access journals than spend paying author fees and subscription to closed access and hybrid journals.
> As long as their expenses are >60% of revenue,
What I truly question is the nature of these expenses. From my point of view inside academia in the field of computer science, and knowing a lot of people in other fields of academia, the actual work put by publishers in the final product that is a published scientific paper is close to zero (except for those fields where there is layout work because they do not use readymade LaTeX documentclasses).
- ikeboy 11y ago>Even if that is true I would rather see public money sponsoring real open access journals than spend paying author fees and subscription to closed access and hybrid journals. That's a legitimate argument. Shifting around who pays what may very well result in positive externalities. But merely complaining about publisher profits while ignoring their costs doesn't work.