4 ms·
For instance, a major part of scientific research is done in US, isn't it? A good part, roughly on par with Europe, Japan, Russia, and China (number of papers
by merraksh 10y ago
For instance, a major part of scientific research is done in US, isn't it?
A good part, roughly on par with Europe, Japan, Russia, and China (number of papers is hardly a measure of scientific production anyway):
https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/20k5dk/top_40_countries_by_the_number_of_scientific https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/20k5dk/top...
Does that mean that the US tax payer should be the major contributor to an hypothetical worldwide scientific activity?
All tax payers on this planet (at least those living in a country with sizeable research spending) already contribute to the worldwide scientific knowledge. I believe this is a good thing.
[edit: typo]
- grondilu 10y ago> All tax payers on this planet (at least those living in a country with sizeable research spending) already contribute to the worldwide scientific knowledge. I believe this is a good thing. Then you still get a free-rider problem, regarding all people that did not pay taxes for this research. You can ignore the issue but tax payers may not.
- merraksh 10y agoAgreed, but all taxpayers fund only a portion of the worldwide research and benefit from all of it, so the trade-off is still in favor of sharing.