3 ms·
Hmm you're probably right - I didn't consider sustained low interest rates. The decline started long before rates came down but I've no idea how 30+ years of d
by anexprogrammer 10y ago
Hmm you're probably right - I didn't consider sustained low interest rates. The decline started long before rates came down but I've no idea how 30+ years of differently funded schemes would look (ie without the funding changes). That's a lot of compound interest.
> let's not forget Gordon Brown
Oh he gets no free pass on pensions - he raided them for billions.
My personal pension has performed disastrously from 2 bad years it'll probably never recover properly from. There went my early retirement thoughts. My parent's generation retirement options look pretty good.
- Ntrails 10y agoWe're probably still understating the deficits by assuming interest rates will increase soon™ - and yet the deficits are somewhere in the region of 1.5 times GDP in the UK[1]. It's terrifying I empathise with you on the personal pension - but that's the reality of risk/reward investments. I'd have thought a lot of the bad performance should have recovered based on current markets? Depending on your age the solution is usually to: -Contribute more -Risk on (aiming for higher rewards) -Work longer. I think it's really really important to recognise that early retirement probably means finishing work ~65 years old if you want a comparable "lifetime in retirement" to earlier generations who retired at 55. One simply cannot expect to spend 25 years in full retirement after only working 25 years. I think as a society we've got to make some huge adjustments in expectations, because we're stuck in a mindset from 70 years ago that isn't really viable. Personally I expect to aim to retire "early" into a different role that is less stressful and in the countryside - but I don't intend to stop working until much later. [1] I haven't seen updated numbers in a few years, maybe it's better now..