> Nobody needs to be flying drones near airports. But who defines 'near'? At present, this is defined by the industry with a vested interest in passing the cos

> Nobody needs to be flying drones near airports. But who defines 'near'? At present, this is defined by the industry with a vested interest in passing the costs onto regulators and law enforcement. Not in investing in drone detection or mitigation technology. CTRs around airports already deprive residents of their airspace rights, often to a radius of 5nm from an airport. In many cities that means no drones in a large chunk of residential area.