2 ms·
Care to give some examples? Some examples which from my point of view seem pretty clear cut: Laziness and purity fall squarely under "language specification".
by tome 11y ago
Care to give some examples?
Some examples which from my point of view seem pretty clear cut:
Laziness and purity fall squarely under "language specification". There's no way of seeing them as a problem with libraries or community.
'I think a lot of the Haskell community is obsessed with mathematical "cuteness", which basically they take to mean "infix-operator-heavy" notation.' is a problem of community (and arguably language specification), certainly not of tooling or infrastructure.
"String should not be [Char]" is a problem with libraries (and arguably specification). Certainly not community or tooling.