4 ms·
> ...true Americans... Careful with that; it's the no true scotsman fallacy. The sad thing is that these people are, in fact, True Americans.
by nothrabannosir 11y ago
> ...true Americans...
Careful with that; it's the no true scotsman fallacy. The sad thing is that these people are, in fact, True Americans.
- dietrichepp 11y agoHere it's used as a rhetorical device, "true Americans" is an appeal to our sense of national identity. Be careful identifying fallacies by the superficial qualities they have, pay attention to the context where phrases are used.
- gtremper 11y agoIsn't "no true Scotsman" an appeal to national identity?
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- dietrichepp 11y agoNo it's not. It's a redefinition of terms to exclude counterexamples. I could say "no sandwich is vegetarian" and you show me a grilled cheese sandwich and I say "no true sandwich is vegetarian." The problem is that people have been passing around a cheat sheet of logical fallacies, but using the mental version of a regex to try and match them. This is not a reliable technique for identifying fallacies. Usually, you would want to recognize them by their content, not their form, and it's essential to know the difference between formal and informal fallacies.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- SherlockeHolmes 11y agoThank you for the great post! I especially agree with your second paragraph. I admit that my post constitutes a mixture of ethos, pathos, and logos - as opposed to being perfectly aligned with logical stipulations.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]