So I agree with the intent of the article that pushing distribution to the edge is a noble goal. But safe-harbors should be expanded -- why should a company ha

So I agree with the intent of the article that pushing distribution to the edge is a noble goal. But safe-harbors should be expanded -- why should a company have to police it's users. That seems ridiculous. If the country feels something is wrong it should send a letter or police officer to make sure that it is taken down, but that is all.