3 ms·
Or here's an alternative theory: New parenting styles have led to a generation that refuses to put up with any injustices and unfairness, no matter how small, a
by whack 11y ago
Or here's an alternative theory: New parenting styles have led to a generation that refuses to put up with any injustices and unfairness, no matter how small, and the confidence to stand up to the people who inflict those injustices. The older generations, who have implicitly accepted those injustices the same way our grandfathers implicitly accepted racism, can't understand why anyone else would refuse to accept it, and see all these legitimate complaints and attempts to address them, as being "entitled whining." Most likely, our grandfathers would have characterized the entire civil rights movement in an identical manner as well.
I'm not saying I believe in the above theory. But given that every "anti micro-aggressions" complaint that I've read defaults to the same extreme anecdotal evidence, and vague claims of entitlement, I've yet to see the above alternative theory being disproven in any way.
Every generation complains about how the next one is useless[1], and yet, every generation turns out to be smarter than the previous one[2], and historically, has succeeded in making the world slightly more egalitarian, fair, and less discriminatory. Chances are, 30 years from now, people on internet forums will be talking about how their own generation was perfect, how we were Neanderthals on the wrong side of history, and how their kids are ruining the world.
[1]: http://mentalfloss.com/article/52209/15-historical-complaints-about-young-people-ruining-everything http://mentalfloss.com/article/52209/15-historical-complaint...
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effect
- Chris2048 11y ago> has succeeded in making the world slightly more egalitarian, fair, and less discriminatory Or has succeeded in making the world seem more fair. The wealth gap in many developed countries is larger than ever, the media and political institutions, more controlled than ever. As for anti micro-aggression complaint, that include stuff like this?: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/03/student-accused-of-violating-university-safe-space-by-raising-he/ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/03/student-accused-o... http://www.nationalreview.com/article/418273/university-study-certain-rooms-are-microaggressions-themselves-katherine-timpf http://www.nationalreview.com/article/418273/university-stud... http://www.nationalreview.com/article/418273/university-study-certain-rooms-are-microaggressions-themselves-katherine-timpf http://www.nationalreview.com/article/418273/university-stud... http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/09/the-rise-of-victimhood-culture/404794/ http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/09/the-rise...
- whack 11y agoThose are interesting (infuriating?) articles, but it goes back to what I mentioned earlier. One group points to examples of people saying obviously racist/prejudiced/offensive things. The other group points to examples where people over-react in silly ways. You really can't draw any conclusions on the basis of anecdotal evidence unfortunately.