3 ms·

Both examples above still "do business in the US". Are there large scale examples following the original proposal of "Firms ought to refuse to do business in j

Both examples above still "do business in the US". Are there large scale examples following the original proposal of "Firms ought to refuse to do business in jurisdictions that do this authoritarian shit. Seriously. As it is, nobody in their right mind will do business with US firms where privacy matters." Sure there are assorted pre/post snowden terms, etc. But, businesses, especially multinationals, are still going to do business in the US. That was my point. I find it helpful that given the shitacular privacy laws in the US, at least Apple and Microsoft are being proactive about taking steps. That said, due to family relations, I hear a lot about european data privacy, but, well, countries like German and Britain have a pretty cozy relationship with US equivalents.

nickpsecurity 11y ago
"Sure there are assorted pre/post snowden terms, etc. But, businesses, especially multinationals, are still going to do business in the US. That was my point" Oh OK. That's a lesser point that doesn't concern me as much. Our concern is if the U.S. controls the security of their products. Merely selling them in the U.S. doesn't allow for that. If anything, they'd compromise a specific user or product for U.S. targets. This is why the NSA has to hack them whereas they can just get the FBI to compel the local firms to "SIGINT enable" the products as the ECI leaks said. Far as totally outside U.S., there's Asian firms that do that. One guy that taught me a lot about HW security said his company straight-up refuses to do business in the U.S. due to patent suits and other issues. He told me there's plenty of market in Asia and Europe for firms that sell hardware or license I.P.. So, I know at least one does it.
mirimir 11y ago
I meant more "HQed in the US" than "do business in the US". But remember the fights between state tax offices and Amazon. Refusing to do business is also an option.

nickpsecurity 11y ago

"Sure there are assorted pre/post snowden terms, etc. But, businesses, especially multinationals, are still going to do business in the US. That was my point" Oh OK. That's a lesser point that doesn't concern me as much. Our concern is if the U.S. controls the security of their products. Merely selling them in the U.S. doesn't allow for that. If anything, they'd compromise a specific user or product for U.S. targets. This is why the NSA has to hack them whereas they can just get the FBI to compel the local firms to "SIGINT enable" the products as the ECI leaks said. Far as totally outside U.S., there's Asian firms that do that. One guy that taught me a lot about HW security said his company straight-up refuses to do business in the U.S. due to patent suits and other issues. He told me there's plenty of market in Asia and Europe for firms that sell hardware or license I.P.. So, I know at least one does it.

mirimir 11y ago

I meant more "HQed in the US" than "do business in the US". But remember the fights between state tax offices and Amazon. Refusing to do business is also an option.