2 ms·
> Stating Apple is employing misleading tactics without > stating what isn't misleading I thought it was obvious from what I'd written. Prefixing their cur
by peteretep 11y ago
> Stating Apple is employing misleading tactics without
> stating what isn't misleading
I thought it was obvious from what I'd written. Prefixing their current answer with the single word "Yes." would have made the whole part feel considerably more trustworthy.
> is disingenuous at best
Assuming bad faith and saying that the best possible interpretation of someone's actions is that they're being intentionally misleading really has no part on HN, especially as an add-on to poor comprehension.
- mitchty 11y agoYour answer implies that the only answer you would accept to the question of if a product contains trace amounts of lead to then be yes. I am stating that is an unrealistic position without explaining why. Much like stating a reply must be yes or no and only yes or no directly ensures nuance cannot exist. I was assuming good faith to your questions in my response to you as well. But in your last sentence here I will refrain from any further discussion. Thank you for your time.