4 ms·
There's a lot of ground between definitive proof and "personal observation of many cues". Put it this way: are there any scientific reasons, however nebulous o
by hyperpape 11y ago
There's a lot of ground between definitive proof and "personal observation of many cues".
Put it this way: are there any scientific reasons, however nebulous or merely suggestive, to suspect that this is the case?
- ChrisDutrow 11y agoYeah, if you google it, a lot of stuff comes up. I'm sure if you google "GMO's are not toxic" you'll find a lot of stuff supporting that claim too. My advice would be to start paying attention to nutrition in general, then over time you can draw your own, educated conclusions. Unfortunately I don't think is a topic that you will be able to find a black-and-white answer to.
- brianwawok 11y agoHow about looking at it from the flip side. Things you put in your body can have a pretty massive effect on you. I would rather err on the side of paying $.05 too much for the corn that people have been eating for 50 years over the newest GMO strain. You only get one body. I do not want to beta test things in my body if I don't have to.
- hyperpape 11y agoThis might be right, but it's irrelevant to the thread you're in, which is about whether the claim about subtle toxicity is something we should believe.