Calling somebody a "goat fucker" is totally different than almost all of these. > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3464628/Woman-35-fac.. http://www.dai

Calling somebody a "goat fucker" is totally different than almost all of these. > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3464628/Woman-35-fac.. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3464628/Woman-35-fac.... This is the closest to this. Except that she posted a phone number which caused the victim to be harassed by a whole lot of other people. She wasn't arrested for calling her names, she was arrested and possibly charged because of this fact alone. > http://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/blog/2013/05/23/a-methuen.. http://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/blog/2013/05/23/a-methuen.... > http://www.businessinsider.com/teen-justin-carter-faces-tria.. http://www.businessinsider.com/teen-justin-carter-faces-tria.... > http://www.fox5dc.com/news/local-news/15763074-story http://www.fox5dc.com/news/local-news/15763074-story > http://www.wdrb.com/story/30881928/judge-olu-stevens-gives-m.. http://www.wdrb.com/story/30881928/judge-olu-stevens-gives-m.... > http://thefreethoughtproject.com/man-wins-35000-arrested-cal.. http://thefreethoughtproject.com/man-wins-35000-arrested-cal.... All of these others appear to be threatening messages, which, while somewhat controversial, are different animals than a simple name calling/satire post. Some would say it'd be negligent not to investigate and/or charge them with this if said action threatened actually came about. The other is a comment made to a judge. They were arrested for contempt of court. This is entirely different, because only judges get to make this call in the US. Lots of people probably say similar statements on Facebook about POTUS, I've seen people say it without coming out and saying it but they weren't afraid of the law in this case. The last case was acquitted, shown to NOT be legally arrested. Kind of disproves your claim, or at least offers contrary evidence.