4 ms·
I'm on a Mac, so I can't review your application. Most of the developers that I know are on *nix/ OS X. We're in different circles; I'm sure you'll have clients
by pistoriusp 17y ago
I'm on a Mac, so I can't review your application. Most of the developers that I know are on *nix/ OS X. We're in different circles; I'm sure you'll have clients.
I don't really see why a person would want to use a desktop application instead of a web based application like Balsamiq. I honestly believe that the next step to improving Balsamiq would be to stop using Flash.
(Edited to provide more clarification than just: "I'm on a mac.")
- thenduks 17y agoI don't have a single peer using Windows either. As a fellow escapee of the windows world you may be interested in a (non-flash) alternative to balsamiq called Mockingbird (http://gomockingbird.com/ http://gomockingbird.com/). It uses the Cappuccino framework (so that's 'Objective-J') like 280slides -- that means you'll need Firefox 3.6 or Chrome probably, but I know you're already on top of that :)
- dzlobin 17y agoSeconding mockingbird, It's awesome.
- old-gregg 17y agoI don't really see why a person would want to use a desktop application instead of a web based application Heh, maybe because it works? And works everywhere?