3 ms·
Yes, "universally" should not then be restricted to "most programmers". Those are incompatible. It would be like saying that the Universal Declaration of Human
by dalke 11y ago
Yes, "universally" should not then be restricted to "most programmers". Those are incompatible. It would be like saying that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights aren't meant to apply to all humans.
I would prefer "what's near universally regarded as un-fun by programmers". Which would simply place you in the small minority, rather than being placed outside the universe of programmers. It could still be wrong, depending on the threshold for "near universal", but it wouldn't be obviously confusing.
- pessimizer 11y agoThe vast majority of programmers have never written 10 lines of any type of assembler. I wouldn't doubt that most would scowl at the idea of having to write it, but that's just because they've been told it's unfun, and it doesn't look like algol.