5 ms·
After every disaster, you can come up with a process that would have stopped that specific disaster. That doesn't mean it's a good idea to implement that proces
by danielweber 11y ago
After every disaster, you can come up with a process that would have stopped that specific disaster. That doesn't mean it's a good idea to implement that process everywhere.
- auntienomen 11y agoAnd yet swords have guards. If a disaster recurs repeatedly -- and if fixing it costs essentially nothing -- then it should be fixed.
- bryanrasmussen 11y agoAnd after every disaster that occurs again and again you might increase your interest in averting the next disaster.
- danso 11y agoIt's too bad you're being downvoted. It was not too long ago that people blamed the Germanwings Flight 9525 crash on how the cockpit door was designed to protect against hijackers, post 9/11: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/03/26/world/europe/germanwings-cockpit-door-lock.html http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/03/26/world/europe/g...