the central idea of the video isn't really supported by anything. You missed the point of the video. Thinking of encryption as a 'lock' is only a metaphor, it

the central idea of the video isn't really supported by anything. You missed the point of the video. Thinking of encryption as a 'lock' is only a metaphor, it isn't actually a 'lock'. There aren't 2 sides to this 'debate.' There is no debate here. Something is either encrypted or it isn't. There is no in between. If you want to take an opposing side in a debate, you would have to say something like "encryption is a bad idea and shouldn't be allowed to exist, we must wipe it from the face of the earth." Yeah... good luck with that. Not only would attempting such a task be futile and foolhardy, but the vast majority of political will would be aligned against attempting such an idea since so much of the modern world rests upon encryption. in the rest of our legal system. Nothing there is 100% accurate. Our legal system doesn't rest on the absolutes of mathematical thinking in the way that encryption does. 2+2 = 4 is '100% accurate'