4 ms·

Amazon promised bi-annual transparency reports here: https://blogs.aws.amazon.com/security/blog/tag/Transparency+report https://blogs.aws.amazon.com/security/b

• wfunction 10y ago
  Maybe they meant biennial rather than biannual?
  • function_seven 10y ago
    I always thought those two terms were equivalent, and that "semiannual" was the every-six-months one. Turns out I as wrong.[1] [1] http://writersrelief.com/blog/2011/05/biannual-biennial-or-semiannual/ http://writersrelief.com/blog/2011/05/biannual-biennial-or-s...
    • comex 10y ago
      Many (most?) sources define "biannual" only as "twice a year". Yet Merriam-Webster says: "Some people prefer to use semiannual to refer to something that occurs twice a year, reserving biannual for things that occur once every two years."
      • function_seven 10y ago
        It's a good lesson for contract writers and anyone else that wants to be clear. Never use any of those terms. Instead, write, "Inspections will be done every 24 months", or, "The toner needs to be ordered every six months". If something is supposed to occur every other Friday? Write it just like that, or "every 14 days". Don't say, "Paychecks are distributed bi-weekly"
        • wfunction 10y ago
          Is it common to give out paychecks twice a week though? I feel like common sense could rule out one of those cases...
          • richmarr 10y ago
            Say you've got a 10 new joiners per week at your high-turnover packing factory, and a sign outside the admin office that says "Paychecks are distributed bi-weekly". Maybe typically 5 of them have had a job before in the area, 3 have had a job elsewhere and 2 have never had a job. Not all of them have the same level of education. How many will misunderstand your sign? Might any of those misunderstandings about money cause problems for people? Considering the comparitive cost of writing the sign as "every two weeks", and the reduction in potential confusion, it seems like a no-brainer to write it that way.
            • wfunction 10y ago
              I mean are you talking about jobs meant for those with some kind of college education, or are you talking about jobs aimed at (say) middle-school drop-outs? For the latter, I can see it, but for the former it's almost insulting to try to simplify things too much just in case the employee doesn't have common sense that they will need on the job anyway...
              • richmarr 10y ago
                I was using a low-income example to make the point clear, but the same principle applies to everyone. By assuming a high-education environment you might nudge down the number of misunderstandings. You'll nudge it further if you assume English is everyone's first language. [Note that these assumptions are probably discriminatory] You'll nudge it further if you assume that nobody in your working environment is dylsexic, or has any other linguistic impairment. [This assumption is certainly discriminatory] You'll nudge it further if you assume that everyone is operating at 100% all the time... which is just plain untrue, as nicely summed up by this slide from Microsoft's Inclusive Design reference: https://marcysutton.github.io/mobile-a11y/img/injury.png https://marcysutton.github.io/mobile-a11y/img/injury.png While you might be insulted by language that insufficiently feeds your desire to feel good about your intelligence, your right to not be insulted is a lower priority than communicating important information clearly.
  • mikx007 10y ago
    Or Centennial? :)
• CamperBob2 10y ago
  Bezos talks a good game. He's got a record of promising to work for things like patent reform without much follow-through.
  • r0m4n0 10y ago
    I can speak personally to a warrant Amazon literally said "no thanks" to. It took a while for me discover (and Amazon never informed me it occurred) but later in court, officials released Amazon's denial of the warrant on grounds of being too wide sweeping and vague. I will upload it later and redact all the details... The exact same verbiage was used for a few other companies including Comcast who bent over backwards to lower their dragnet. This statement by Bezos rings really true to me and they will keep my business.
• djsumdog 10y ago
  Maybe they got served a letter and it's all dead canary. (more likely the people who decided that all have new jobs now)