Ironic, since the "people clinging to it" seem to have read and understood the retraction and you seem to be repeating a deliberately misleading headline. The

Ironic, since the "people clinging to it" seem to have read and understood the retraction and you seem to be repeating a deliberately misleading headline. The two humps are still there, the retraction was only of the claimed innateness of this distribution, not of the distribution observed.