4 ms·
>"We are going faster and faster so we will get there" is not the way you calculate the likelihood of reaching a destination within a certain time. Why not? Wi
by monkmartinez 11y ago
>"We are going faster and faster so we will get there" is not the way you calculate the likelihood of reaching a destination within a certain time.
Why not? With incomplete information, you can not say the inverse is true either.
At the end of the day, most of us have no direct control over the AI situation.
- erikpukinskis 11y agoI think a better approach would be to start with a more opinionated model of cognition, and then look at how the space defined by the model is getting coverage in research. "The brain is a Von Neumann machine and our ability to model it tracks with Moore's law" is demonstrably false. There are better models than that.