2 ms·
I'm confused what your point is. What's PC about the previous statement? You seem to agree with them. Are you mad you aren't making more, or that Zuck isn't mak
by KirinDave 11y ago
I'm confused what your point is. What's PC about the previous statement? You seem to agree with them. Are you mad you aren't making more, or that Zuck isn't making less?
We could unionize, you know? It would DEFINITELY mean outlier cash wages on the high side would go down as we normalize benefits. Right now the Valley is very focused on the needs of young, affluent, educated men who can take significant career risk. If we unionized, things like reasonable *ternity leave and a minimum standard of health care would appear, as would formalization of vacation rules ("unlimited vacation" is common but actually means "no vacation just dispensations from your founder for good behavior"), etc.
And we need less people like Linus Torvalds, thanks. It's possible to be good at tech and NOT be an insufferable asshole riding atop a human pyramid like some rendition of 300's Xerxes.