The reality is likely more complex than we understand it but "deterrence to others" is the greatest value gained here. Assuming what's written is more or less c

The reality is likely more complex than we understand it but "deterrence to others" is the greatest value gained here. Assuming what's written is more or less close to the truth Jeremy is an opportunist and a bully. It seems important that people like that shouldn't be allowed to interfere with legitimate business through baseless legal accusations without consequence. I'd feel better if the matter was resolved in a more controlled objective and less personal way. That being said it does appear that trying to extort money from someone through legal harassment is a pretty safe play in terms of personal risk which doesn't seem right to me. I think we'd be much better off culturally if litigious behavior were not as acceptable as I perceive it to be.