3 ms·
You're missing the difference between this: * http://packages.ubuntu.com/source/trusty/bash http://packages.ubuntu.com/source/trusty/bash and what I actually
by JdeBP 11y ago
You're missing the difference between this:
* http://packages.ubuntu.com/source/trusty/bash http://packages.ubuntu.com/source/trusty/bash
and what I actually pointed to, which was this:
* http://packages.ubuntu.com/trusty/bash http://packages.ubuntu.com/trusty/bash
Your second sentence reveals that you're not getting the differentiator. To get this, read the blurbs and what the Microsoft developers themselves emphasize about this. It's pretty much the very first thing mentioned every time. Sometimes, its even in the headline.
* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11391891 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11391891 (in the third sentence)
* https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/commandline/2016/04/06/bash-on-ubuntu-on-windows-download-now-3/ https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/commandline/2016/04/06/bash... (in the first sentence)
* https://blogs.windows.com/buildingapps/2016/03/30/run-bash-on-ubuntu-on-windows/ https://blogs.windows.com/buildingapps/2016/03/30/run-bash-o... (in the fourth paragraph, repeated in the fifth)
* http://blog.dustinkirkland.com/2016/04/howto-ubuntu-on-windows.html http://blog.dustinkirkland.com/2016/04/howto-ubuntu-on-windo... (in the first sentence)
* http://www.hanselman.com/blog/DevelopersCanRunBashShellAndUsermodeUbuntuLinuxBinariesOnWindows10.aspx http://www.hanselman.com/blog/DevelopersCanRunBashShellAndUs... (in the URL!)
- dzdt 11y agoSo what I get from that is that, like cygwin, and unlike msys, the target is full linux userspace compatibility. So is it essentially like MS is bundling cygwin as a windows system library?