3 ms·
Nonetheless he is right. As far as I remember Vim is based on the code of an editor that was similar to vi, and not vi itself.
by Syssiphus 10y ago
Nonetheless he is right. As far as I remember Vim is based on the code of an editor that was similar to vi, and not vi itself.
- adrusi 10y agoVi is a standard not a specific implementation. There was an original Vi, but since it's a standard unix tool, it got cloned by everyone who ever made a unix clone after it was added to BSD. Vim can be invoked to conform to the vi standard, although usually it only gets used that way when a vim user is on an unfamiliar machine.
- Syssiphus 10y agoInteresting view. I've never seen vi as a standard. But it makes sense.
- bch 10y agoTechnically something can't call itself Unix(tm) without vi(1) [0][1] [0] http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/7908799/xcu/vi.html http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/7908799/xcu/vi.html [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_UNIX_Specification https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_UNIX_Specification
- baldfat 10y agoWell I made his short two word answer into an explanation.
- groovy2shoes 10y agoI believe it was Stevie (a vi clone for the Atari ST).