4 ms·
Taking a look at his Wikipedia page, it seems like his PR company wrote it. The man is described as a "philantropist" ffs. The history of the page looks a bit s
by exDM69 11y ago
Taking a look at his Wikipedia page, it seems like his PR company wrote it. The man is described as a "philantropist" ffs. The history of the page looks a bit suspicious too. There's very few mentions of any kind of criticism or negative statements about him or his ventures.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_Prince https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_Prince
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- chippy 11y agoYeah if only there was a way of changing that page to say something else.
- exDM69 11y agoAnd engaging in a Wikipedia editing contest against a supposedly well funded PR company on a very controversial topic? Don't expect a very positive outcome from such endeavors. At least the page isn't full of blatant lies (well the philantropy is a bit questionable) but it's very selective about the facts it brings up. I'd expect it would be much harder to get approved edits done on this page than most other Wikipedia pages, including those of big name politicians. You'd have to really pay attention to the sources you'd be citing and careful about the language you use not to get disputed/deleted.