Thanks for the inputs - I agree, there must be 100s of similar applications each year relating to on demand photography. We love the concept of eversnap, howev

Thanks for the inputs - I agree, there must be 100s of similar applications each year relating to on demand photography. We love the concept of eversnap, however it is a bit of a risk leaving your wedding day/event in the hands of (possibly inebriated) guests :) I think our target market is less events/weddings and more the other areas of personal and professional life where great photos can make a BIG difference, but price and time constraints (for finding the right photographer)discourage people from using traditional services (like PrettyInstant). Examples would be when renting out your home, selling something online, photos for the marketing department (headshots, teamphotos, e-commerce product photos, CV-style photos etc. We love the tinder interface and it seems to work well, but at the end of the day it won't put us head and shoulders above the competition. What really sets us apart is that with us, you book a photographer by judging how they shot a photo which had similar requirements to your shooting. It seems crazy to us as photographers that PrettyInstant (for example) guarantees to only work with 'the best' photographers, yet depending on what style you are looking for, the lighting and the general setting (is it a headshot or documenting a party?), any one photographer could be the perfect fit for you or they could be terrible.