3 ms·
Each of those sources were written after she was chosen as a 30-under-30 so it doesn't really answer the question of what made Forbes choose her. You have to a
by gdix 10y ago
Each of those sources were written after she was chosen as a 30-under-30 so it doesn't really answer the question of what made Forbes choose her.
You have to admit that it is kind of interesting that the list are pretty much all founders or people who have invented something incredible. Her bio on Forbes's article lists her as a "rising star"[1]. Founder, founder, founder, founder, rising-star, founder, founder, founder. Am I sexist for pointing this out?
[1] http://www.forbes.com/special-report/2014/30-under-30/technology.html http://www.forbes.com/special-report/2014/30-under-30/techno...
- aiiane 10y agoThere's also a designer, an engineering manager, a "security expert", a researcher, and a "hacker" - all men Also, note that just because the sources cited in grandparent were written after, that doesn't mean she wasn't already working on it before, e.g. https://medium.com/@triketora/where-are-the-numbers-cb997a57252#.31uw8sqvo https://medium.com/@triketora/where-are-the-numbers-cb997a57... https://github.com/triketora/women-in-software-eng/commit/0245cca39dae607b18fd71303cd55976b42ca444 https://github.com/triketora/women-in-software-eng/commit/02...
- nickpsecurity 10y agoI agree with you based on the data you're giving. It would seem like a PC stunt to add her to the same list as those people. I'm also saying this as a gripe at Forbes rather than critiquing her work. Just seems like a different category.