Okay but the argument is pretty strong that since it was completely written based on divine revelation 2000+ years after the events it describes, the historical

Okay but the argument is pretty strong that since it was completely written based on divine revelation 2000+ years after the events it describes, the historical claims are difficult to corroborate. Is there scholarship on the legitimacy of the Lehi story, and, can you provide a link to the 101 version instead of a database? (I know, lazy, but you're probably used to the burden of proof being on you on this topic.)