I remember being about 14 (in 1991; 25 years ago) and learning about the effects of CO2 emissions on climate change in school. It seemed blatantly obvious - the

I remember being about 14 (in 1991; 25 years ago) and learning about the effects of CO2 emissions on climate change in school. It seemed blatantly obvious - the only remotely feasible chance the planet had was to replace coal/oil with nuclear. The risk calculation was trivial. (Even after seeing the effects of Chernobyl in the years after 1986 in southern Sweden - we couldn't pick berries and mushroom in the forest for a while and moose meat was contaminated iirc.) I'm so sad that we're still having this debate 25 years later and nothing has changed.