3 ms·
And Lomborg's response, debunking Howard Friel’s claims in return, is here: http://www.lomborg.com/dyn/files/basic_items/118-file/BL%20reply%20to%20Howard%20Fri
by Luyt 17y ago
And Lomborg's response, debunking Howard Friel’s claims in return, is here: http://www.lomborg.com/dyn/files/basic_items/118-file/BL%20reply%20to%20Howard%20Friel.pdf http://www.lomborg.com/dyn/files/basic_items/118-file/BL%20r...
- cwan 17y agoNot sure why you're getting downvotes for this. Lomborg's defense directly addresses Friel's rather serious claims (the same cannot be said for Friel). On the other hand, at least as this blog notes: http://www.windsofchange.net/archives/where_tone_torpedoes_credibility.html http://www.windsofchange.net/archives/where_tone_torpedoes_c..., we now know quite clearly where Newsweek stands on the issue especially as they outsource their skepticism to foreign news services despite recent challenges to the "gold-standard" IPCC reports.