[citation needed] — that #4 placing for nuclear looks especially suspect if you consider the recent furore over Hinkley Point C in the UK[1]. [1] e.g. http://w

[citation needed] — that #4 placing for nuclear looks especially suspect if you consider the recent furore over Hinkley Point C in the UK[1]. [1] e.g. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/apr/05/scrapping-hinkley-for-renewable-alternatives-will-save-tens-of-billions http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/apr/05/scrapping...