3 ms·
FYI, Armstrong thinks that OO sucks [1] so it's weird to see him claim his language is a better OOP language than others. [1] http://harmful.cat-v.org/software
by incepted 11y ago
FYI, Armstrong thinks that OO sucks [1] so it's weird to see him claim his language is a better OOP language than others.
[1] http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/OO_programming/why_oo_sucks http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/OO_programming/why_oo_suck...
- rdtsc 11y ago... "Joe likes to be funny" ... Besides this idea of taking a label away from something you don't like is also a good strategy in general. He obviously doesn't think Erlang should do multiple inheritance. He just points out languages that have been calling themselves OO these years have been impostors. Also not sure if I mentioned, Joe like to make witty jokes. So don't take it too seriously.