3 ms·
> I simply don't understand what is the huge effort in using the restroom appropriate to your physical gender, and simply avoid the psychological conflict with
by coldpie 11y ago
> I simply don't understand what is the huge effort in using the restroom appropriate to your physical gender, and simply avoid the psychological conflict with the rest of the population.
I suspect you haven't really been paying attention and are just submitting your gut feeling here. For example, in attempting to prevent your hypothetical "sexual fantasy" scenario, here's one real consequence of this law:
https://twitter.com/JayShef/status/712845760287494144 https://twitter.com/JayShef/status/712845760287494144
The simple fact is any real problems caused in bathrooms are already covered by harassment laws. These new laws take away a freedom people already had, and I'm not really aware of any real problems caused by people having those freedoms. Are you? What problems have these laws solved? Hypothetical situations don't count.
- return0 11y agoThat tweet espouses way more stereotypes than it's supposed to mock.
- abiox 11y agoCare to elaborate?
- return0 11y agoThat a man entering a women's restroom is something to be feared of (!), that a woman's loyalty depends on somebody shielding her from strange men and that a husband's duty is to shield her By the same logic, mixed restrooms are dangerous.
- abiox 11y agothis is the stance of the legislators. the point is to show they're fully in the "good intentions paving the road to hell" mode. they didn't want dudes in the ladies' room, so now they have dudes in the ladies' room.
- return0 11y agoI believe it's women who are more concerned about this than men.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]