Similar case from around that time frame - https://popehat.com/2013/11/07/what-is-the-quantum-of-proof-necessary-for-police-to-rape-and-torture-you-in-new-mexic

Similar case from around that time frame - https://popehat.com/2013/11/07/what-is-the-quantum-of-proof-necessary-for-police-to-rape-and-torture-you-in-new-mexico/ https://popehat.com/2013/11/07/what-is-the-quantum-of-proof-... It ticks pretty much all the boxes. - drug dog "alerting" - x-ray, multiple enemas, colonoscopy - completely against the citizen's consent The major difference is that the police officers bothered to obtain a warrant(it didn't take much). The law analysis of the case was inconclusive, but the lawyers weren't really sure that the police officers hadn't acted lawfully.