3 ms·
According to the timesonline.co.uk article the video was online for a full month before it was removed, and it was a top ranked video under "most entertaining".
by viggity 17y ago
According to the timesonline.co.uk article the video was online for a full month before it was removed, and it was a top ranked video under "most entertaining". I don't think this should have gone to trial, but I do think its fair to say that Google should have done more. Does anyone believe they only got one complaint after a month?
- invisible 17y agoI think the likelihood that it was at the top of "most entertaining" for two months is nil. I think the likelihood that it was on the site for 2 months and the last 48 hours it was in the most entertaining section is high. It probably got a total of 20-50 views before that, which may have resulted in 0 complaints given most people would just close the window.