Then you add value without taking up more space. This would reduce the cost of a human requirement: shelter. This is what LVT is for. Our present system is abo

Then you add value without taking up more space. This would reduce the cost of a human requirement: shelter. This is what LVT is for. Our present system is about maximising the availability of credit to absorb all spare capacity. This is why we are working full time despite massive productivity improvements. This is why when women entered the labour force it was all absorbed by land prices. The 1% in the main don't want to "build vertically". They want to do nothing and have you work and give them a cut of their income. I'm fine with people making life better and getting a cut. ps this may be the last comment I can make as HN hates LVT and any criticism of rentiers