5 ms·
I believe the intent was that despite the flaws in Fry's character, it doesn't make his argument any less compelling.
by zuminator 11y ago
I believe the intent was that despite the flaws in Fry's character, it doesn't make his argument any less compelling.
- vidarh 11y agoI get that, but the personal attack is still there. The comment just also says that we shouldn't let personal character affect the argument, which I agree with. I just found the structure of the argument where the commenter basically ends by arguing that they themselves have engaged in "an act of dissociation or insansity" quite amusing.
- wanda 11y agoActually I just wanted to agree that Fry is a bit dodgy but also point out that it is irrelevant that anybody thinks he's dodgy.