It's the Guardian. You can't separate their financing from their politics because their financial setup was done specifically to allow them to lose money by run

It's the Guardian. You can't separate their financing from their politics because their financial setup was done specifically to allow them to lose money by running a newsroom far larger than their readership would normally allow. The Guardian has not advocated for stricter government policies: they can't because they can't even define tax avoidance, let alone formulate a solution. Instead they've engaged in moral crusades in various attempts to shame companies into paying more tax than they actually have to, whilst simultaneously refusing to do so themselves. That is, I believe, general hypocrisy.