4 ms·
> It is a pretty sweet language with amazing features and type class Type classes is the one thing that OCaml does not have. It might get a sort of similar to
by LeonidasXIV 11y ago
> It is a pretty sweet language with amazing features and type class
Type classes is the one thing that OCaml does not have. It might get a sort of similar to use mechanism called modular implicits, but we will see about that in the future.
- mercurial 11y agoYeah, that's the OCaml version of "the year of Linux on the desktop" :(
- StreamBright 11y agoYou can still be hopeful. :)
- StreamBright 11y agoSorry I meant type system, doing multi tasking did not help :)
- unhammer 11y agoOne thing OCaml does have, however, that I often miss in other languages, is polymorphic variants. Sometimes you want a function to only work on a subset of a variant, without having to write silly handlers for things that the computer ought to be able to check never happen.