4 ms·
Original article: http://www.nature.com/articles/nmicrobiol201648 http://www.nature.com/articles/nmicrobiol201648 Link to higher-res image: http://www.nature.c
by paulsutter 11y ago
Original article: http://www.nature.com/articles/nmicrobiol201648 http://www.nature.com/articles/nmicrobiol201648
Link to higher-res image: http://www.nature.com/article-assets/npg/nmicrobiol/2016/nmicrobiol201648/images_hires/w582/nmicrobiol201648-f1.jpg http://www.nature.com/article-assets/npg/nmicrobiol/2016/nmi...
- teh_klev 11y agoI think you meant to link to this for the better quality image: http://www.nature.com/article-assets/npg/nmicrobiol/2016/nmicrobiol201648/images_hires/w926/nmicrobiol201648-f1.jpg http://www.nature.com/article-assets/npg/nmicrobiol/2016/nmi... The NYT has a "super jumbo" diagram as well: https://static01.nyt.com/images/2016/04/12/science/11TREEOFLIFE/11TREEOFLIFE-superJumbo.jpg https://static01.nyt.com/images/2016/04/12/science/11TREEOFL...
- guelo 11y agoClassic case where PNG would have been superior.