3 ms·
While good, sort of scary because a lot of small players would host ads to get revenue and some of the ads would be filed with sexual content, even though these
by yeukhon 11y ago
While good, sort of scary because a lot of small players would host ads to get revenue and some of the ads would be filed with sexual content, even though these websites aren't even porn sites. Just some random humor site or some fortunate teller site, so if this were really true, wouldn't we be be looked at!?
- downandout 11y ago"Ads filled with sexual content"!="child porn"
- yeukhon 11y agoyes, I know, but 1/1000 may be. what if it's loaded over http behind the scene without any display? still transmitted over your network. What if the site just got hacked?
- erikpukinskis 11y agoThen those facts become part of the investigation. Having your computer searched doesn't mean you at guilty or even that you will be charged. It just means your machine is implicated in a crime.
- lsaferite 11y agoThe unfortunate reality is that if you become a suspect that is good enough to burn you at the stake for much of the population. The same with rape really. Once you've been a suspect or, even worse, accused you are basically screwed.
- erikpukinskis 11y agoThose are problems that should be solved directly.
- manarth 11y agoIt's specifically referring to child porn, rather than generic adult content. That said, the UK equivalent, the IWF (Internet Watch Foundation) effectively blacklisted Wikipedia, because of the Scorpions' album cover: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Watch_Foundation_and_Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Watch_Foundation_and_...
- yeukhon 11y agoSee my response below about child porn. Thanks.