4 ms·
I am not sure what the point of this article is. He is essentially unhappy that Tesla is, in his opinion, deceptive about the reality of owning one of its cars.
by beeboop 11y ago
I am not sure what the point of this article is. He is essentially unhappy that Tesla is, in his opinion, deceptive about the reality of owning one of its cars. I disagree - I don't think anyone is really that surprised when they buy a laptop marketed as "Up to 12 hours of battery life" and then get 3 hours of battery life while playing a video game. I think people understand this is how electronics work, and I doubt anyone is spending $40k after taxes and fees on a car without, at some point, realizing or being told that the 300 mile depends on a lot of factors. A pretty basic search on the internet will tell you this in under 60 seconds of effort. And I don't think anyone buys this car under the impression they will fill it up in a couple minutes like an ICE.
- ambrice 11y agoIf you read the comments, he's a hardcore libertarian whose problem is really the tax subsidies on Tesla. The rest of it is just weak reaches for additional justifications.
- beeboop 11y agoHe might have a stroke if he sees how much oil companies get in subsidies.
- ambrice 11y agoHe claims that he doesn't like that either, but that without those subsidies ICE cars are economically viable but Tesla would never sell cars. Anyway, I'm giving you the reasonable summary, don't go actually reading those comments, they're worse than the article.