3 ms·
Conkeror, Emacs-style Xulrunner based web browser
- zitterbewegung 17y agoWho wants to port javascript to elisp?
- docgnome 17y agoThere is actually another plan to build a QT version built on top of WebKit. It hasn't started yet though s they are waiting on more mature QT bindings. http://minno.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/moin.cgi http://minno.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/moin.cgi
- mnemonicsloth 17y agoSteve Yegge worked on that for a while: http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2008/11/ejacs-javascript-interpreter-for-emacs.html http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2008/11/ejacs-javascript-int... He said it was a good project for getting to know both languages' little quirks.
- chronomex 17y agoThanks for the pointer, that was interesting. Disturbingly, it makes me want to wedge it into one of Emacs' web browser modes.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- mootothemax 17y agoHow on earth did they get this far in development without thinking about how confusing their name is with the original KDE browser Konqueror? http://www.konqueror.org/ http://www.konqueror.org/
- docgnome 17y agoIt was actually originally named after a beer. There has been discussion of changing the name but not much interest as most communication about it is in text where the name isn't confusing. Or is at least less so.
- rpdillon 17y agoThis has gotten so much more advanced since the days of the Firefox plugin. I just installed it, and I have to admit, getting rid of all the UI cruft that adorns normal browsers is really a welcome change. I know Emacs pretty well, so using it comes naturally. Thanks for posting this; I'd written off the extension version, but the XULRunner based version is fabulous.