I can't tell from your post, but remember: this paper is from 1993. That we still today have Ruby vs Lisp posts with fib(n) as the test is pathetic. And as a

I can't tell from your post, but remember: this paper is from 1993. That we still today have Ruby vs Lisp posts with fib(n) as the test is pathetic. And as a Haskell guy, I'm going to call out anyone trying to use fibonacci to measure things, even though GHC is kicking butt.