They were not the only one covering the story TBH. What they were was the only newspaper to directly name them post-inquiry. http://www.theguardian.com/uk/1997

They were not the only one covering the story TBH. What they were was the only newspaper to directly name them post-inquiry. http://www.theguardian.com/uk/1997/feb/15/lawrence.ukcrime http://www.theguardian.com/uk/1997/feb/15/lawrence.ukcrime This actions honestly fits the Daily Mail's typical populist, outrage-driven, go-with-the-gut-feeling style. The vast majority of the time this does not work out for them. "Even a broken clock is right twice a day" etc. Really, though, if I were a Yahoo user, I would be more concerned personally about the Daily Mail's Buzzfeedisms: the celebrity clickbait, their recent embrace of "native advertising". This sounds like the perfect sort of things that Yahoo would try to insert into some of their products for extra monetization. And a great way to make the Yahoo user experience even worse than it is already.